Sounds like the Eagle making a big story out of a couple sentences uttered "informally" by the governor. Would like to see it happen but throw in some D-II state colleges or JuCo powerhouses as well and make it a round-robin tournament. And make it a worthwhile event and turn it into a charity event where the players go visit some place and give them the proceeds.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brownback: Governor’s Cup for Kansas college basketball?
Collapse
X
-
I kinda' liked the 'is the glass half empty or half full?' at the beginning of the thread. Kinda' of an interesting point/counterpoint.
I have to say I can appreciate Brownback's approach. And the strategy (which has already been pointed out by the Yetti).Last edited by shocka khan; December 11, 2014, 12:42 PM. Reason: redacted political comments per Kai's earlier request
Comment
-
Originally posted by _kai_ View PostNo sane program would give up a home conference game.
I was addressing a logistics question with a question of my own. I do think that I know the answer to it, though. In the one year that KU football wasn't bad and they made it to the Orange bowl, they worked it out to play Mizzou at Arrowhead for a neutral site instead of in Lawrence as it was scheduled that year. I see no reason why it would be impossible to do the same in basketball.
Like you (and I) said, it is certainly not something that a reasonable program would agree to voluntarily. [which... I guess says something about the sanity of KU that they agreed to give up their home football game]
Comment
-
If K-State came to Koch, it would be far from "meh".
If WSU went to Manhattan, I would attend and would drive up there feeling a bit more excited than "meh" implies.
If WSU played K-State anywhere else and I didn't get to attend, I'd still be pretty psyched about going to work the next day and "chatting" with some of my coworkers who are K-State grads. (assuming WSU won)
I just don't understand the "meh" feeling. Playing K-State sounds more exciting than about 90% of the opponents that WSU has on the calendar this year.
Comment
-
I actually think Weber will try to initiate something either this offseason or the next one. He is losing recruiting battles and feeling pressure to do something about it.
A home-and-home would only serve to bury them further...but following an NIT bid or two and a fairly linear decline in performance, he might just pick up the phone.
Ironically they will be the team that "needs" the series at that point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostIf K-State came to Koch, it would be far from "meh".
If WSU went to Manhattan, I would attend and would drive up there feeling a bit more excited than "meh" implies.
If WSU played K-State anywhere else and I didn't get to attend, I'd still be pretty psyched about going to work the next day and "chatting" with some of my coworkers who are K-State grads. (assuming WSU won)
I just don't understand the "meh" feeling. Playing K-State sounds more exciting than about 90% of the opponents that WSU has on the calendar this year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostIf K-State came to Koch, it would be far from "meh".
If WSU went to Manhattan, I would attend and would drive up there feeling a bit more excited than "meh" implies.
If WSU played K-State anywhere else and I didn't get to attend, I'd still be pretty psyched about going to work the next day and "chatting" with some of my coworkers who are K-State grads. (assuming WSU won)
I just don't understand the "meh" feeling. Playing K-State sounds more exciting than about 90% of the opponents that WSU has on the calendar this year.
I take your point about opposing fans; living on the east coast makes that a non-issue for me personally but I would enjoy hearing about it and understand the rivalry could be intense. I underestimated that factor--fair enough.Shocker Nation, NYC
Comment
-
Back to the Governor's Cup -- upon further review, I've come up with a solution:
Because the different conference affiliations makes scheduling such a challenge, just give the award to whichever team finished highest in the final polls any given year. Brownback could get the old roundball rolling with a proclamation recognizing the 2014 winners. ;)
Given his academic history, no one could accuse him of prejudice, and I suspect our posters both left and right would support his decree; and then he'd conclude by exhorting all three schools to give it all they've got in pursuing the 2015 award.
Problem solved -- you're welcome.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndShock View PostA K-State game is definitely meh to me. The K-State fans I know are already meh about their own team after they were super fans 5 years ago. I warned them that Weber was a meh hire but they didn't believe me."I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
Comment
-
Well, I'm not so sure I am in favor of us playing KU. By playing KU we are giving credibility to the most overpriced school in the state, that also has the lowest growth rate of the Division 1 schools. Why give them that type of credibility? Since we have "nothing to gain" from playing them, I think we should continue ignoring them as if they don't exist and sit back and watch their enrollment numbers decline or flat line (this year they had a small 177 student increase).
BaZenger!Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
Comment